You hold down the sustaining pedal on the grand piano. You reach inside a pluck the bass strings to
sound a pleasing, plausible, but slightly dissonant chord. Sensible enough, pleasant. Keeping the pedal down you pluck a related but different chord in the mid-range, then something a bit similar in the treble. The sounds are
individually interesting if not fascinating, but together they start a
sympathetic vibration where one chord causes the previous one to echo again,
and so on to the next. Every new
combination of chords is revealing, and the chords keep coming until the entire
instrument pulses with striking sounds that contrast but also reinforce one
another. You lose track of beginning and end; the result is a sustained shimmer
that in which all the components sound, but the total is something different
again, something that seems to contain the answers to all the questions ever
and never asked.
For me that’s what it’s like to read Paul Auster’s
fiction. Moon Palace is no
exception. The words are well chosen but
ordinary. There is nothing flashy or
poetic, no Updike thesaurus and no Banville lyricism. The plot starts out as something ordinary,
but step by step the main character becomes separated from objective reality,
he loses his grip and enters a world where truth and fiction blur, where real
and unreal become one, where art and reality become confused, where causation becomes
indeterminate. Observing the dissolution
while reading the seemingly ordinary prose is pleasure enough, but the surreal
experiences that follow in the Austerian landscape are both chilling and beautiful. You look into the kaleidoscope and you see that the individual fragments are all realistic, but the whirling pieces together form a kind of meta-world, a way of seeing and experiencing which is truly special. Objectivity and emotion combine to form a vision which belongs uniquely to Auster.
experiences that follow in the Austerian landscape are both chilling and beautiful. You look into the kaleidoscope and you see that the individual fragments are all realistic, but the whirling pieces together form a kind of meta-world, a way of seeing and experiencing which is truly special. Objectivity and emotion combine to form a vision which belongs uniquely to Auster.
No need to go into details about Moon Palace. There are plots and subplots, repeating
themes, unlikely coincidences, startling revelations. We go further and further into the looking
glass, and we end at a beginning, at a place where we see the world anew, where
nothing can be taken for granted, where all is accepted, and in which human
experience through all of history reverberates forever. We are dazed and a little confused, but we
feel part of something epochal where interior and exterior merge, where past,
present and future come together.
No idea how he does it.
No comments:
Post a Comment