‘Cloud Atlas’ so impressed me that I’ve pledged to read
everything that David Mitchell has published.
‘The Thousand Autumns of Jacob de Zoet’ is his most recent novel. Some of the literary virtuosity that produced
‘Cloud Atlas’ is on display here, but this is at heart a much more traditional
novel. It’s well researched and
skillfully written historical fiction. The
underlying message is similar to that of ‘Cloud Atlas’. Greed and self-interest are at the center of
most human interaction. Simple selfishness
motivates most of our actions. Evil is
common as the ultimate expression of that selfishness. Compassion and empathy are rare, perhaps
temporarily self-promoting, but ultimately self-effacing. Beauty matters to those that perceive it, but
it rarely plays more than an incidental role in the larger historical
procession. And that’s OK. It’s just the way that it is.
The chronology is straightforward. There is only one story here, though there
are subplots and threads that keep the reader engaged. Dialect is not nearly so prominent an issue
as in ‘Cloud Atlas’. This is a more
unified, less risky, less ambitious, and perhaps more wholesome book. It’s a good read, even if it lacks the
high-wire literary thrills that characterize ‘Cloud Atlas’.
The movie ‘Cloud Atlas’ was IMHO extraordinarily beautiful,
and the writers and directors did a masterful job of translating literary
wizardry into cinematic magic. I’ve
never seen a more creative and far-reaching film adaptation of a novel. ‘Jacob de Zoet’ would be a much easier
transition to film. The characters are
striking, the plot has dramatic turns, the language is straightforward enough
to work on the screen. I’d see it in a
heartbeat. Just please don’t
sentimentalize the ending.
I’m not completely ignorant of history, but I knew only the
simplest facts about Japan circa 1800.
The colonial rivalries and complex interactions with traditional Japanese
society are fascinating and are portrayed with no axes-a-grinding. History is indeed messy, and human nature is
at the root of much of the disarray. But
there are individuals of real merit, and Mitchell portrays them as everyday
heroes. He seems to have a profoundly
pessimistic view of our innermost tendencies and our ultimate fate, and his
specialty may turn out to be spinning out that destiny in engaging narratives which include a few truly admirable characters, a few fascinating evil ones,
and even more simple folk that live without much of a plan or purpose. It’s a worldview that on most days I can
subscribe to, though I do have days imbued with more optimism and hope. I’d like to believe that our own nature does
not doom us to unhappiness and the obligation to inflict suffering on
others. Maybe the bright spots outshine
the gloom?
But maybe not.
No comments:
Post a Comment