Have always been a big fan of Kingsley Amis’s ‘Lucky Jim’,
for me one of the funniest novels ever about academic life. Had never read
anything by his son, Martin Amis, so I decided to try ‘The Pregnant Widow’. Martin’s is now a much bigger literary
reputation than his father’s, so my expectations were high. I was looking for something smart and funny
as a break from Proust. I joined the
2013 Proust reading group on Goodreads.com.
The plan is to read all of the Recherches during 2013. No idea how long I’ll stick it out, but I am
currently ahead of the reading schedule and enjoying ‘Swann’s Way’ very
much. Nonetheless it’s very dense and
sometimes tough going, so something light and witty seemed like the perfect
intermission.
Martin and Kingsley Amis in 1965 |
First of all, Martin Amis is brilliant, well-read, and
insightful. But all in service of
what? I don’t mind negativity at
all. The St. Aubry Patrick Melrose
novels are witty and also very bleak, but they engage real feelings, sometimes
to a painful degree. I found the Martin
Amis to be slick, snotty, snarky, and utterly devoid of any character that
might evoke real feelings in me. All of
the characters are lost in one way or another, most to a degree that they seem
to inhabit an artificial world devoid of basic human emotion. They can’t really feel anything except vague
self-hatred and snotty “Why is everyone
happier than I am?” that gets them nowhere.
They’re trapped in a place that frankly I don’t find all that
interesting.
Ok, so yeah I get the basic premise about the difficulties
presented to young folks by the sexual revolution. I’m of exactly that generation. I was facing some of those same choices in
1970, the year when most of the novel’s plot takes place. Some of my reactions were constructive, some
were self-destructive, but I did manage to feel something and react. These characters just blunder on and spend
page after page wondering in witty, abstract, smart, and ultimately boring ways
why they’re not as happy as their overwhelming sense of entitlement tells them they should be.
Amis manages to bring in references to pretty much the
entire history of the British novel, and he does a disservice to every single
book he cites. And I realize he knows he’s
doing that. I just don’t want to read
about it unless there’s going to be some kind of genuine heartfelt reaction
invoked at some point. But no. Nothing.
Zilch. The writing is full of
witticisms, many of which I’m sure I missed.
Some are probably too specifically British for me, some too
erudite. Who cares? These are people I choose not to spend time
with. Period.
I hope this book is not representative of Martin Amis’s
overall output, and I hope the book’s outlook is in no way an accurate
reflection of his take on life. If so,
what a terrible waste.
No comments:
Post a Comment